I have been mulling over your question for the past couple of weeks, and after looking into the P2P Foundation web pages for a while this evening I can better understand why volunteers may be reluctant to come forward. It appears you and the other organizers of this site have already done a
formidable amount of work, and those of us browsing through the pages quite understandably may be thinking "what could I do to improve on this project?". One approach might be for you to pick out the several or possibly half a dozen things that most frustrate you about the site. Are
there things that seem inconsistently cataloged? Hard to find? Hard to pin down just what is the major topic of particular pages?...
Possibly there are problems with how content is added - including reviewing or vetting, or indeed even pinning down who SHOULD have the option to edit or make changes. In any case, I wonder if there isn't a way to break this into smaller, more manageable tasks. The newcomer probably
does not see most of the shortcomings that may be obvious to those of you who have plainly invested a LOT of time and effort into building these pages.
